By Danielle R.
Brissette
There is a theory that was popular
in the nineteenth century called the “Great Man Theory.” Thomas Carlyle defined
it by saying that “the history of the world is but the biography of great men.”
Essentially, history is shaped by a
handful of heroes, great men with great influence. Think of Charlemagne,
Napoleon, Alexander the Great, George Washington and, as some suggest, Sam
Houston. Although this theory has been much debated, our contemporary educational
philosophy for teaching history seems to follow these men (and they are, almost
universally, men) across time and nations as a way of framing the past. It is
easy to argue that by focusing on our heroes history acquires substance, a
point of reference, and through that, meaning for its students.
It is also easy to see why someone
might argue that Sam Houston was a Great Man. He was the first and third
president of Texas, the hero of the Battle of San Jacinto, an U.S. congressman,
an adopted son of the Cherokee nation, a close friend of President Andrew
Jackson, and the only man to be governor of two states, just to name a few of
his more notable accomplishments.
However, I disagree. Sam Houston
was not a great man. He was, as we all are, simply a man with foibles, flaws,
and faults surprisingly similar to those that many of us face today. It is this
theme I wish to explore.
Sam Houston was not lucky in love. His
first wife, the eighteen year old Eliza Allen, left him after three scant
months of marriage. This action rocked Sam hard, personally and politically.
Pursued by gossip and a broken heart, Sam resigned his governorship of
Tennessee and tried to run away from his problems by returning to his Cherokee
friends. In a letter to President Andrew Jackson he said, “And now that domestic misfortune; of which I say nothing; and
about which there are ten thousand imputed slanders; has come upon; as a black
cloud at noonday I am to be hunted down! What am I? an Exile from my home; and
my country, a houseless unshelter'd wanderer, among the Indians!” (11 May
1829).
Sam’s
time with the Cherokee was not particularly happy. He was depressed and, as
Marquis James describes it, “gave himself up to the fatal enchantress of
alcohol.” His adopted family stopped calling him “the Raven” and started
calling him “the Big Drunk” as he sank further and further into alcoholism. Was
this descent part of his efforts to escape his distress over his marriage?
Almost certainly. Part of the reason might have also been actual physical pain.
Shot during the Battle of Horseshoe Bend years earlier, Sam’s wound had never
healed. It oozed blood and pus until his dying day and had to be bandaged every
twenty-four hours. Certainly, this caused him a great amount of pain which the
alcohol would have helped to dull or abate. But the whiskey also impaired his
judgment and his abilities, made him the butt of jokes, and cured absolutely
nothing.
Eventually, Sam married a Cherokee
woman named Tiana Rogers. He surfaced somewhat from his drunken state and they
opened a trading post together, the Wigwam Neosho. Eventually, that too came to
an end; the couple divorced (amicably, it seems) according to Cherokee custom and
went on their separate ways. Tiana remained with the trading post, and Sam
moved on to Texas. Two marriages down the drain, and again Sam outdistanced his
problems by moving South.
This
move was, perhaps, one of Sam Houston’s best decisions. It led to a fulfilling
political career, introduced him to his third and final wife, Margaret, who
gave him a full home and generally happy house. She also required of him
sobriety and clean language. With happiness came some sorrow as politics kept
Sam away from home much of the time, and the distance was felt by the whole
family.
I’m
telling these stories not to belittle Sam in any way. I don’t want to air his
dirty laundry just because I can. In my opinion, Sam Houston’s flaws serve to
make him human. Who can say they do not know someone who suffers from heartache?
In our modern day, with nearly half of marriages ending in divorce, what family
cannot empathize with Sam, Eliza, and Tiana? Alcoholism and addiction are still
common illnesses. Many of us know, first or secondhand, the overwhelming
darkness of depression. And who has not, at one point, wished to simply run
away? Sam’s foibles make his accomplishments all the more impressive, but also
all the more relatable. He would have fit in at that AA meeting. Or at your
family reunion. He’d be that guy reading the
Iliad in the doctor’s office’s waiting room. Or skyping with his kids in
Starbucks.
We, like Sam, are flawed. He, like
us, is great.
No comments:
Post a Comment